Skip to content

Conversation

@filipecabaco
Copy link
Member

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • setAuth ran automatically for realtime
  • prioritize setAuth tasks
  • tried a new approach to test where we move to protected visibility so we have a test implementation for SupabaseClient that mostly binds protected to public methods

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 2, 2025

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 16194033190

Details

  • 9 of 10 (90.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+8.3%) to 81.14%

Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
src/SupabaseClient.ts 9 10 90.0%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 16193987041: 8.3%
Covered Lines: 118
Relevant Lines: 135

💛 - Coveralls

@grdsdev grdsdev requested a review from hf July 3, 2025 12:18
Copy link
Contributor

@hf hf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks OK

@grdsdev grdsdev force-pushed the fix/realtime-set-auth branch from 02045f0 to efbf5b5 Compare July 9, 2025 10:45
@filipecabaco filipecabaco force-pushed the fix/realtime-set-auth branch 2 times, most recently from 9b743e2 to a46b4e3 Compare July 10, 2025 09:02
@filipecabaco filipecabaco changed the base branch from master to next July 10, 2025 10:59
@filipecabaco filipecabaco force-pushed the fix/realtime-set-auth branch from 4cfbcbb to d8f2d79 Compare July 10, 2025 11:34
@filipecabaco filipecabaco merged commit 8a5a02a into next Jul 10, 2025
12 checks passed
@filipecabaco filipecabaco deleted the fix/realtime-set-auth branch July 10, 2025 11:51
@filipecabaco filipecabaco restored the fix/realtime-set-auth branch September 11, 2025 13:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants